• Journal of Internet Computing and Services
    ISSN 2287 - 1136 (Online) / ISSN 1598 - 0170 (Print)
    https://jics.or.kr/

Process Governance Meta Model and Framework


JungGyu Lee, Seung Ryul Jeong, Journal of Internet Computing and Services, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 63-72, Aug. 2019
10.7472/jksii.2019.20.4.63, Full Text:
Keywords: Process Governance, Organization Governance, Corporate Governance, Framework, IT Governance, Strategic Alignment Model, Business Governance

Abstract

As a sub-concept of corporate or organization governance, business governance and IT governance have become major research topics in academia. However, despite the importance of process as a construct for mediating the domain between business and information technology, research on process governance is relatively inadequate. Process Governance focuses on activities that link business strategy with IT system implementation and explains the creation of corporate core values. The researcher studied the basic conceptual governance models of political science, sociology, public administration, and classified governance styles into six categories. The researcher focused on the series of metamodels. For examples, the traditional Strategy Alignment Model(SAM) by Henderson and Venkatraman which is replaced by the neo-SAM model, organizational governance network model, sequential organization governance model, organization governance meta model, process governance CUBE model, COSO and process governance CUBE comparison model, and finally Process Governance Framework and etc. The Major difference between SAM and neo-SAM model is Process Governance domain inserted between Business Governance and IT Governance. Among several metamodels, Process Governance framework, the core conceptual model consists of four activity dimensions: strategic aligning, human empowering, competency enhancing, and autonomous organizing. The researcher designed five variables for each activity dimensions, totally twenty variables. Besides four activity dimensions, there are six driving forces for Process Governance cycle: De-normalizing power, micro-power, vitalizing power, self-organizing power, normalizing power and sense-making. With four activity dimensions and six driving powers, an organization can maintain the flexibility of process governance cycle to cope with internal and external environmental changes. This study aims to propose the Process Governance competency model and Process Governance variables. The situation of the industry is changing from the function-oriented organization management to the process-oriented perspective. Process Governance framework proposed by the researcher will be the contextual reference models for the further diffusion of the research on Process Governance domain and the operational definition for the development of Process Governance measurement tools in detail.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from November 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[APA Style]
Lee, J. & Jeong, S. (2019). Process Governance Meta Model and Framework. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 20(4), 63-72. DOI: 10.7472/jksii.2019.20.4.63.

[IEEE Style]
J. Lee and S. R. Jeong, "Process Governance Meta Model and Framework," Journal of Internet Computing and Services, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 63-72, 2019. DOI: 10.7472/jksii.2019.20.4.63.

[ACM Style]
JungGyu Lee and Seung Ryul Jeong. 2019. Process Governance Meta Model and Framework. Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 20, 4, (2019), 63-72. DOI: 10.7472/jksii.2019.20.4.63.